Second Brain

The firm remembers, not just the partner.

Templates, past work, positions taken and the reasoning behind them become a knowledge base the whole firm can ask. A new associate asks Sage before asking the partner, and gets the firm's own answer.

OverviewDocumentsTasksDeadlinesDrafts
Termination notice.pdfWitness statements.docx

Put the witness statements in date order and flag where they contradict each other. Use Case chronology

Case chronologyFrom 2 documents
  1. 12 Mar 2026Written warning served
  2. 28 Aug 2026Termination notice served
  3. 12 Sep 2026Statement of claim served
ConflictTwo statements give different dates for the warning.
Proposed due dateLawyer approval needed
Event
Statement of claim served · 12 Sep 2026
Legal basis
HMK Art. 127 · two weeks to answer
Due date
26 Sep 2026
Awaiting lawyer approvalEditConfirm
Tasks
Draft the answerAv. Deniz Aksoy
Request payroll recordsAv. Can Yıldız
Remember

Indexed by meaning, not by file name

Documents, email and system records are read for what is inside them and held in one place, in your own environment.

A question finds the right passage without anyone having to know which file it was in.

What the firm keeps

  • Precedent that can be found

    Past drafts and filings, searchable by what they argued rather than by filename.

  • The firm's positions

    How this firm handles a recurring question, and why it settled there.

  • Templates in use

    The current version, with the clauses the firm actually stands behind.

  • Know-how from closed matters

    What was learned on a matter, kept where the next one will look.

  • Client context

    What has been agreed with a client before, so nobody contradicts it by accident.

  • The sources behind it

    Every entry carries where it came from, so the knowledge can be checked rather than believed.

Step by step

A question a junior would otherwise carry down the corridor to a partner.

  1. 01

    The firm's material is connected

    Documents, templates and past work, from the systems the firm already runs.

  2. 02

    Sage reads and keeps the useful part

    With the source attached, so each entry can be traced back to the document behind it.

  3. 03

    A conflict comes to a person

    When something new contradicts what is held, a person decides whether it is a duplicate, an update, or a genuinely different position.

    A person decides
  4. 04

    Anyone can ask it

    In plain language, with the same source-linked answer a partner would have given from memory.

  5. 05

    It compounds

    Every matter that closes leaves the firm knowing more than it did, in a form the next person can use.

The questions people ask

How it works, what it touches, and where it stops. If yours is not here, ask us directly.

Is this just search?

Search finds a document. This holds what the firm has decided and why, with the source under it, so a repeat question gets the firm's own answer rather than a list of files.

Does it learn from our data?

It works from your authorised material, your preferences and your corrections, under governance you set. Where your firm enables training or fine-tuning on its own material, that is the firm's decision and it can be withdrawn.

Who decides what goes in?

Your firm. Incoming knowledge that conflicts with what is held is put to a person rather than silently overwritten.

Can a junior see everything?

Access is by role, so each person reaches what their role allows.

What happens when someone leaves?

What they wrote down stays with the firm, in a form the next person can search, which is the point of keeping it here rather than in a head.

A two-day demo, built around your needs

We agree your priorities together and, over two days, show how Sage works on an example workflow we choose with you.